The devil’s been plenty busy on screen in the past 50 years. Think of all the possession films that “The Exorcist” spawned – some good, many bad, and arguably none quite as unsettling as the original ...
This sequel to the 1973 horror classic can't keep up with its predecessor. You're meant to scream bloody hell. The devil is back in business in "The Exorcist: Believer," now only in theaters where it ...
You are able to gift 5 more articles this month. Anyone can access the link you share with no account required. Learn more. The creative, commercial, and overall cultural impact of 1973’s “The ...
The Exorcist franchise finally returns to theaters 18 years after the last installment, taking the top spot at the box office, but like most of the films spun off of the 1973 horror classic, it failed ...
Currently sitting at 30% “rotten” on the Tomatometer, The Exorcist: Believer ranks below the 1973 original (“certified fresh” at 78%) and 1990’s The Exorcist III (58% “rotten”), the threequel written ...
In the long history of horror films since the dawn of cinema, it would be hard to imagine any of them quite having the particular impact of 1973’s The Exorcist, which became the first horror film to ...
Green, who previously tackled ‘Halloween’ with a trilogy, is here trying to match the iconic ‘Exorcist’ from 1973 with what is described as a “new chapter”. Can it replicate the success (hit and miss ...
is routinely referred to as “the scariest movie of all-time.” It’s also become one of the most milked cinematic products, with multiple theatrical and home video reissues over the years. It’s probably ...
Lidya Jewett as Angela Fielding & Olivia Marcum as Katherine during an exorcism in The Exorcist: Believer Image via Universal Pictures When the late, great director William Friedkin unleashed the ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results